Facts of the Case
A and B were political rivals contesting the same election. A believed that B was likely to win the election, which would adversely affect A’s political prospects. Driven by this belief, A fired upon B with the intention of killing him. The act was deliberate and aimed at eliminating B from the electoral contest.
The incident raised a legal question regarding the motive behind the crime and its relevance in determining criminal liability under Indian criminal jurisprudence.
Issues in the Case
The following issues arise for consideration:
- What was the motive behind A’s act of firing upon B?
- What is the distinction between motive and intention in criminal law?
- Whether motive is a necessary ingredient to establish criminal liability.
- How motive influences proof of mens rea and determination of guilt.
Legal Principles Covered Supporting the Proceedings and Judgements
(a) Motive in Criminal Jurisprudence
Motive refers to the reason that prompts a person to form an intention to commit an act. While motive explains why a crime was committed, intention explains what the accused wanted to achieve.
(b) Intention and Mens Rea
Under criminal law, intention is a core element of mens rea. Motive, though relevant, is not essential for proving an offence if intention is otherwise established.
(c) Indian Penal Code Provisions
Under Section 300 of the IPC, murder requires intention to cause death. The motive may strengthen prosecution evidence but is not a substitute for proof of intention.
(d) Case Law
State of U.P. v. Arun Kumar Gupta (2007)
The Supreme Court held that motive is relevant but absence of motive is not fatal when direct evidence establishes intention.
Nathuni Yadav v. State of Bihar (1998)
Reiterated that motive is only an aid in assessing evidence, not an essential element.
(e) Jurisprudential Perspective
From an analytical viewpoint, law punishes intentional acts, not thoughts or motives alone.
Possible Judgement (With Reason)
The court would find that the motive behind A’s act was political rivalry and electoral gain. A feared losing the election and intended to remove B as a competitor.
While motive itself does not constitute an offence, it supports the inference of intention. Since A fired upon B with the intention to kill, the offence would fall under attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC, or murder if death occurs. Motive strengthens the prosecution case but liability rests on intentional conduct.
About lawgnan
Understanding the difference between motive, intention, and mens rea is crucial for criminal law and jurisprudence exams. At lawgana.in, we simplify complex legal concepts through structured, exam-oriented answers supported by case law and statutory provisions. Whether you are an LLB student, judiciary aspirant, or legal researcher, our content helps you analyze criminal liability with precision. Visit lawgana.in today to access high-quality jurisprudence notes, problem-based answers, and comprehensive legal explanations designed for academic and professional excellence.
