Facts of the Case
‘X’ Company is a registered company incorporated under the Companies Act, having a duly registered Memorandum of Association (MOA) which defines its objects and powers. The company’s main objects relate to manufacturing and trading activities. However, the Board of Directors of ‘X’ Company entered into a contract for purchasing immovable property for investment purposes. This transaction was executed without any express or implied authority provided in the Objects Clause of the Memorandum of Association. Subsequently, questions arose regarding the validity of the contract and the binding nature of the transaction on the company.
Issues in the Case
- Whether a company can legally enter into a contract beyond the powers stated in its Memorandum of Association.
- Whether the purchase of property without MOA authority is binding on the company.
- Whether such a contract can be ratified by shareholders or directors later.
- What remedies, if any, are available to the other contracting party.
Legal Principles Covered to Support Case Proceedings and Judgements
Under Indian company law, the Memorandum of Association is the charter document of a company and defines the scope of its activities. Any act done beyond the powers conferred by the MOA is considered ultra vires the company.
The landmark case Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co. Ltd. v. Riche (1875) laid down the doctrine of ultra vires, holding that contracts beyond the object clause are void and unenforceable. Indian courts have consistently followed this principle, as seen in A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v. Life Insurance Corporation of India (1963), where the Supreme Court held that a company cannot divert its funds for purposes not authorized by its MOA.
Such ultra vires acts cannot be ratified even by unanimous consent of shareholders. However, directors may incur personal liability if they cause the company to enter into unauthorized transactions. The doctrine aims to protect shareholders and creditors by ensuring that company funds are used only for authorized purposes.
Possible Judgement
Applying the doctrine of ultra vires, the court is likely to hold that the purchase of property by ‘X’ Company is void ab initio and not binding on the company. The transaction cannot be ratified by shareholders or validated retrospectively. The company may recover its money if traceable, while the directors responsible for the unauthorized act may be personally liable for breach of duty. The other contracting party cannot enforce the contract against the company but may seek equitable remedies where applicable.
About Lawgnan
If you want to understand complex legal concepts like ultra vires acts, company powers, and contract enforceability under Indian law in a simple and practical manner, explore more expert-written legal content on lawgana.in. Whether you are a law student, legal professional, entrepreneur, or academic researcher, LawGana offers clear explanations, case law analysis, and exam-oriented materials tailored to Indian legal frameworks. Stay updated with authoritative articles, notes, and legal insights that help you learn smarter and apply the law confidently. Visit lawgana.in today and strengthen your legal knowledge with trusted resources.
