A High Court withdrew a criminal case pending before one of the Sessions Courts and sentenced the accused to death. What are the remedies available to the convicted person?

Facts of the Case

1. A criminal case was initially filed in a Sessions Court against the accused for serious offenses punishable under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
2. During the pendency of the trial, the High Court invoked its powers under Section 397 and 401 of the CrPC to withdraw the case from the Sessions Court. This is often done if the High Court considers it expedient for proper administration of justice.
3. After withdrawing the case, the High Court itself conducted the trial, admitted evidence, examined witnesses, and ultimately convicted the accused and sentenced him to death.
4. The accused contends that:
   • The High Court may have exceeded its powers by withdrawing the case.
   • The trial procedure might have been unfair, violating principles of natural justice.
   • The death sentence was imposed without sufficient consideration of mitigating circumstances.
5. Given the severity of the punishment, the accused seeks legal remedies to challenge the conviction and sentence on constitutional and statutory grounds.

Issues in the Case

1. Jurisdictional Authority of the High Court
   • Did the High Court have the legal authority to withdraw a criminal case from the Sessions Court and conduct the trial itself?
   • Was the withdrawal in compliance with CrPC provisions or was it arbitrary or ultra vires?
2. Right to Fair Trial and Due Process
   • Whether the accused was afforded a fair trial, including right to be heard, cross-examine witnesses, and access evidence.
   • Did the procedure followed comply with Article 21 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty?
3. Legality of Imposing Death Penalty
   • Whether the High Court considered the “rarest of rare” principle before imposing the death sentence.
   • Was the punishment proportionate to the crime and consistent with Supreme Court precedents?
4. Available Legal Remedies
   • What constitutional and statutory remedies can a convicted person invoke against a High Court judgment imposing death penalty?
   • Whether the accused can approach higher courts for relief under Article 32, 136, or CrPC provisions.
5. Safeguards against Arbitrary Exercise of Power
   • Does the withdrawal and trial by the High Court uphold principles of natural justice and judicial propriety?
   • Are there checks and balances in the Indian legal system to prevent misuse of High Court powers?

Legal Principles Covered

A. Constitutional Provisions

1. Article 21 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty
   • Guarantees the right to life; death penalty can only be imposed in accordance with procedure established by law.
   • Courts must ensure fairness and due process before imposing capital punishment.
2. Article 32 & 226 – Writ Jurisdiction
   • Convicted person can approach Supreme Court (Article 32) or High Court (Article 226) for enforcement of fundamental rights, including protection of life.

B. Statutory Provisions

1. Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), Sections 386-389
   • Provides appeal procedures for conviction and sentence.
   • Section 386 allows appeal in cases where death sentence is imposed to the High Court.
2. Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 435
   • Provides for revision of death sentence by the High Court.
3. Supreme Court Guidelines on Death Penalty
   • Death penalty to be imposed only in the “rarest of rare” cases.
   • Right to adequate representation and appeal is mandatory.

C. Judicial Precedents

1. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684
   • Death penalty must be exceptional, fair, and justifiable.
2. Mithu v. State of Punjab (1983) 2 SCC 277
   • Arbitrary or illegal imposition of death penalty violates Article 21.
3. Criminal Appeals
   • Convicted person can appeal to:
     1. High Court (if trial was in Sessions Court)
     2. Supreme Court under Article 136 (Special Leave Petition)

Possible Judgement / Legal Advice

1. Remedies Available to the Convicted Person
   • First Appeal:
     • File an appeal to the High Court against the High Court’s judgment (under CrPC provisions for death sentence).
   • Revision Petition:
     • File a revision petition in the High Court if there is a jurisdictional or procedural error.
   • Special Leave Petition (SLP) to Supreme Court:
     • File under Article 136 of the Constitution challenging legality, fairness, or procedural lapses.
   • Constitutional Remedies:
     • File Writ Petition under Article 32 in Supreme Court asserting violation of Article 21 (right to life and due process).
   • Review and Curative Petition:
     • After SLP dismissal, the convicted person may seek review and subsequently curative petition in Supreme Court.
2. Advisory Conclusion
   • The accused has multiple statutory and constitutional remedies.
   • Courts must scrutinize death sentence carefully and ensure due process.
   • Remedies include appeal, revision, SLP, and writ petitions to safeguard fundamental rights.

About lawgnan

Understand the legal and constitutional remedies available against a death sentence under Indian law at Lawgnan.in. Learn how the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), Article 21, and landmark judgments like Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab and Mithu v. State of Punjab safeguard the rights of the accused. Explore the process of appeals, revisions, Special Leave Petitions, and writs under Articles 32 and 226 to ensure justice and due process. Visit Lawgnan.in for detailed analyses, expert explanations, and simplified insights into India’s death penalty jurisprudence and constitutional protections.