Facts of the Case
A woman ran towards a well with the intention of committing suicide. Before she could reach the well or jump into it, she was stopped by her neighbours. No physical harm was caused, and the suicidal act was not completed. Despite this, criminal proceedings were initiated against her for attempt to commit suicide. The question arises whether her conduct amounted merely to preparation, or whether it had crossed the threshold into a punishable attempt under Indian criminal law.
Issues in the Case
The following legal issues arise for consideration:
- Whether running towards a well with suicidal intention constitutes preparation or attempt.
- What is the legal distinction between preparation and attempt under criminal law.
- At what stage criminal liability for attempt begins.
- Whether prosecution for attempt to commit suicide is legally sustainable in this case.
Legal Principles Covered to Support Case Proceedings and Judgements
A. Stages of Crime under Indian Law
Indian criminal jurisprudence recognizes four stages of crime:
- Intention
- Preparation
- Attempt
- Completion
Criminal liability usually begins at the stage of attempt, not preparation, unless specifically provided by statute.
B. Meaning of Preparation
Preparation involves arranging the means or measures necessary for committing an offence. It remains a remote act, giving the accused an opportunity to change their mind. Generally, preparation is not punishable.
C. Meaning of Attempt
An attempt is a direct movement towards the commission of an offence after preparation is complete. It is proximate to the intended crime and would have resulted in completion but for interruption.
D. Judicial Test for Attempt
Indian courts apply tests such as:
- Proximity test
- Unequivocality test
If the act clearly indicates intention and is closely connected to the offence, it amounts to an attempt.
E. Application to the Present Case
Running towards the well shows intention and preparation, but the woman had not reached the point of no return. No overt act directly endangering life (such as jumping or leaning into the well) occurred. Hence, the act lacks proximity to the offence.
Possible Judgement
The court is likely to hold that:
- The woman’s act amounts only to preparation, not an attempt.
- There was no direct act towards commission of suicide.
- The essential element of proximity required for an attempt is missing.
- Therefore, prosecution for attempt to commit suicide is not sustainable.
Accordingly, the accused would be acquitted, as criminal liability does not arise at the stage of preparation.
About Lawgnan
Understanding the fine distinction between preparation and attempt is crucial in criminal law, especially in sensitive cases involving intent and mental health. At lawgana.in, we simplify complex criminal law doctrines through clear explanations, case-based reasoning, and Indian jurisprudential insights. Whether you are a law student, judiciary aspirant, or legal professional, our content helps you build conceptual clarity and exam confidence. Explore expert analyses, structured case studies, and practical legal interpretations designed for Indian law. Visit lawgana.in today and strengthen your understanding of criminal responsibility and legal reasoning.
