Enumerate the Salient Features of the Principle of Natural Justice
The Principle of Natural Justice occupies a central position in Administrative Law. Essentially, it ensures fairness, transparency, and reasonableness in administrative decision-making. In modern governance, where administrative authorities exercise wide discretionary powers, natural justice acts as a crucial safeguard against arbitrariness. Therefore, it plays a vital role in maintaining public confidence in the legal system.
Historically, the doctrine of natural justice evolved from moral principles rooted in equity, justice, and good conscience. However, over time, courts transformed it into a legally enforceable standard. Consequently, even when statutes remain silent, courts generally presume that the legislature intended administrative authorities to act in accordance with natural justice. In India, the doctrine derives constitutional strength from Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, which emphasize equality, fairness, and procedural due process.
Thus, the salient features of the Principle of Natural Justice can be understood through its core rules and their judicial development.
Rule Against Bias (Nemo Judex in Causa Sua)
Firstly, the rule against bias is a fundamental feature of natural justice. It means that no person should act as a judge in a matter in which he has a personal interest. In other words, decision-makers must be impartial and free from prejudice. Moreover, this rule applies not only to actual bias but also to the reasonable likelihood of bias.
Furthermore, bias may arise in several forms such as pecuniary bias, personal bias, or official bias. Therefore, even the appearance of bias is sufficient to invalidate an administrative decision. Courts have consistently held that justice must not only be done but must also appear to be done. Consequently, this rule strengthens public trust in administrative authorities and reinforces institutional integrity.
Right to Fair Hearing (Audi Alteram Partem)
Secondly, the rule of fair hearing is another indispensable feature of natural justice. According to this principle, no person should be condemned without being given an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, before taking any adverse action, authorities must provide notice, disclose relevant material, and allow the affected person to present their case.
In addition, a fair hearing includes the right to rebut evidence, submit explanations, and, where necessary, engage legal representation. However, the nature of the hearing may vary depending on the circumstances. For instance, while a full oral hearing may not always be required, a reasonable opportunity must always be ensured. Consequently, any order passed in violation of this rule is generally considered void.
Requirement of Reasoned or Speaking Orders
Another important feature, which has gained prominence in modern administrative law, is the requirement of reasoned or speaking orders. Simply put, authorities must record reasons for their decisions. Therefore, a decision without reasons is often viewed as arbitrary and unfair.
Moreover, recording reasons demonstrates the application of mind and discourages misuse of power. Furthermore, it enables the affected party to understand the basis of the decision and facilitates effective judicial review. Thus, speaking orders promote transparency, accountability, and fairness in administrative actions.
Flexibility of the Principle
Unlike rigid legal rules, natural justice is inherently flexible. Therefore, its application depends on the facts, circumstances, and statutory framework of each case. Courts have repeatedly clarified that natural justice cannot be applied in a mechanical manner.
However, flexibility does not mean exclusion. Rather, any exclusion of natural justice must be explicit or clearly implied by law. For example, in cases involving urgency, public safety, or national security, limited deviations may be permitted. Nevertheless, even in such cases, authorities must act fairly to the extent possible. Consequently, flexibility allows a balance between administrative efficiency and individual rights.
Applicability to Administrative and Quasi-Judicial Actions
Earlier, natural justice was confined mainly to judicial and quasi-judicial functions. However, with the expansion of administrative powers, courts have broadened its scope. Consequently, the principles now apply to administrative actions whenever they affect civil rights, liberties, or legitimate expectations.
Therefore, the distinction between administrative and quasi-judicial functions has become increasingly blurred. Ultimately, any authority exercising power over individuals must adhere to natural justice. This expansion ensures that discretionary powers are exercised responsibly and lawfully.
Mnemonic to Remember the Salient Features
To remember the features easily, use the mnemonic:
“B-H-R-F-A”
B – Bias prohibited
H – Hearing must be fair
R – Reasons must be recorded
F – Flexible application
A – Applies to administrative actions
Thus, this mnemonic helps in quick recall during exams and answer writing.
About Lawgnan
If you are preparing for law exams, judicial services, or competitive examinations, understanding Natural Justice is absolutely essential. Therefore, do not rely on rote learning alone. Instead, focus on conceptual clarity, structured answers, and proper legal reasoning. For more simplified, exam-oriented, and SEO-optimized legal content, visit lawgana.in today. Moreover, the platform offers updated administrative law notes, case-law explanations, and revision tools designed specifically for law students and aspirants. Ultimately, consistent practice with reliable resources can significantly enhance your confidence and performance.
