Tag: judicial reasoning

‘A’ is accused of burning down his house in order to obtain money for which it is insured. It has which a fire occurred, and after each of which fires ‘A’ received payment from a different been alleged that ‘A’ lived in several houses successively each of which he insured, in each of insurance company. Are they relevant facts? Refer to the relevant provision of the Evidence Act.

Facts of the Case ‘A’ is accused of deliberately burning down his own house with the intention of obtaining insurance money. During the investigation, it […]