21. Plea Bargaining

Plea Bargaining is a legal process in criminal law where the accused agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a lesser punishment or a reduction in charges. Introduced in India by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005, it aims to ensure speedy disposal of criminal cases, reduce court backlog, and deliver justice efficiently without a full-fledged trial.

What is Plea Bargaining?

  • Plea Bargaining is a pre-trial negotiation between the accused and the prosecution.
  • The accused voluntarily admits guilt to a lesser offence or seeks leniency in sentencing.
  • It is not available for all offences and is subject to certain legal conditions.

Legal Provision: Section 265A to 265L of CrPC

  • The concept is codified under Chapter XXIA of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
  • Introduced through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005, and effective from July 5, 2006.
  • Applicable only in cases where punishment is up to 7 years of imprisonment and not applicable for socio-economic offences or crimes against women and children.

Types of Plea Bargaining

1. Charge Bargaining

  • Accused pleads guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for dropping serious charges.

2. Sentence Bargaining

  • Accused pleads guilty in return for a lighter or reduced sentence.

3. Fact Bargaining

  • Negotiation on which facts will be presented before the court (rare in Indian context).

Eligibility Conditions for Plea Bargaining

  • The offence must be punishable with imprisonment of less than 7 years.
  • The offence should not affect the socio-economic condition of the country.
  • The case must not involve offences against women or children below 14 years.
  • The application for plea bargaining must be voluntary and in writing by the accused.

Procedure of Plea Bargaining (CrPC Sections 265B to 265F)

  • The accused files an application before the trial court.
  • Court issues notice to the Public Prosecutor/complainant and fixes a date.
  • Court ensures the application is voluntary and not influenced by coercion.
  • If satisfied, a mutually satisfactory disposition is worked out.
  • Judicial Magistrate delivers judgment as per the agreement.
  • No appeal lies against the judgment passed under plea bargaining.

Benefits of Plea Bargaining

  • Reduces case pendency and judicial burden.
  • Helps in quick resolution and delivery of justice.
  • Provides the accused a chance at reform by avoiding lengthy sentences.
  • Reduces investigation and trial costs.
  • Beneficial for victims, who may receive compensation or closure.

Criticisms of Plea Bargaining

  • May result in coerced admissions of guilt, especially by underprivileged accused.
  • Could lead to miscarriage of justice if used improperly.
  • May undermine the victim’s rights in serious cases.
  • Moral and ethical concerns over negotiated justice.
  • Often seen as compromising the principles of a fair trial.

Landmark Case Laws

State of Gujarat v. Natwar Harchandji Thakor (2005)

  • Recognized that settlement in criminal matters (except heinous offences) could be beneficial.
  • Laid down that plea bargaining encourages speedy trial and reduced burden on the system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *