‘A’ made a Statement to ‘B’ that he was the owner of the property. ‘B’ believed it and purchased the property. In fact, ‘A’ was not the owner at the time of sale but subsequently he became the owner. ‘A’ files a suit to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sate, he had no title. Can he succeed? Decide.

Facts of the Case Issues in the Case Legal Principles Supporting the Case Proceedings A. Section 115 – Estoppel (Indian Evidence Act, 1872) This section […]

‘A’ intentionally and falsely leads ‘B’ to believe that certain land belonging to ‘A’ and thereby induces ‘B’ to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of ‘A’ and ‘A’ seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that at the time of the sale, he had no title. Can he succeed? Discuss.

Facts of the Case ‘A’ intentionally and falsely represents to ‘B’ that a particular piece of land belongs to him. Relying on this false representation, […]

A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. Decide.

Facts of the Case ‘A’ intentionally and falsely represented to ‘B’ that a certain piece of land belonged to him. Relying on this misrepresentation, B […]

‘A’ intentionally and falsely leads ‘B’ to believe that certain land belongs to ‘A’ and thereby induces ‘B’ to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of ‘A’, and ‘A’ seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. Can he do so? Examine by applying the relevant provision of the Evidence Act.

Facts of the Case ‘A’ intentionally and falsely represents to ‘B’ that a particular piece of land belongs to him. Relying on this representation, ‘B’ […]