Meaning of Sub-Agent
A Sub-Agent is defined under Section 191 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. A sub-agent is a person employed by an agent, and working under the control of that agent, to perform acts which the agent has undertaken to perform on behalf of the principal. The law makes it clear that an agent cannot, without the authority of the principal, lawfully appoint a sub-agent. If an agent does appoint a sub-agent without the authority, then the principal is not bound by the acts of that sub-agent, and the agent remains personally responsible for those acts. However, when the sub-agent is properly appointed, the principal is bound by the acts of the sub-agent as if they were done by the agent himself, provided the sub-agent works within his scope of authority. This maintains accountability while also allowing flexibility in business dealings.
Duties and Liabilities of Sub-Agent
According to Section 192 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the duties and liabilities of a sub-agent are twofold. First, the agent is responsible to the principal for the acts of the sub-agent. Second, the sub-agent is directly responsible to the agent, but not directly to the principal, unless the sub-agent has been lawfully appointed and the principal has expressly agreed to recognize him. If the sub-agent acts negligently, fraudulently, or beyond his authority, both the sub-agent and the agent can be held liable. The principle ensures that the principal is not left unprotected due to unauthorized delegation of authority. This maintains the chain of accountability in commercial and legal transactions, making the appointment of sub-agents a matter of legal scrutiny.
Importance of Proper Appointment
The appointment of sub-agents becomes important in cases where the nature of the agency or trade usage allows such delegation. For example, in shipping, customs clearance, or large-scale commercial transactions, agents often cannot perform every duty personally and need sub-agents to complete specific tasks. The law permits such delegation under necessity or established customs. When properly appointed, the acts of the sub-agent bind the principal just as if done by the agent. However, in unauthorized appointments, the principal is not bound, and the agent becomes solely liable. Thus, the legal framework surrounding sub-agents balances the need for commercial efficiency with the requirement of accountability and trust between the principal and the agent.
Real-Life Example
Suppose Mr. Arjun appoints Mr. Ravi as his agent to manage his business of importing machinery. Ravi, due to heavy workload, appoints Mr. Karan as a sub-agent for customs clearance without informing Arjun. If Karan mishandles documents and the machinery is delayed, Arjun is not bound by Karan’s acts, and Ravi alone is responsible. However, if customs clearance work is commonly delegated in the trade, and Arjun had implicitly authorized Ravi to use sub-agents, then Karan’s acts would bind Arjun, provided Karan acted in good faith and within authority. This example shows how trade customs and lawful delegation play a crucial role in deciding liability.
Mnemonic to Remember – “A-D-I”
To easily recall the concept of Sub-Agent, think A-D-I:
- A = Appointed by Agent
- D = Directly responsible to Agent, not Principal
- I = If properly appointed, binds the Principal
Think: “Sub-Agent = A-D-I: Appointed, Direct to agent, Indirect to principal.”
About lawgnan:
Master the concept of a Sub-Agent under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 with clear notes, legal provisions, and real-life examples at Lawgnan.in. Learn how sub-agents are appointed, their duties, liabilities, and how their acts bind or do not bind the principal. With simplified explanations and the A-D-I mnemonic (Appointed, Direct to agent, Indirect to principal), Lawgnan makes exam preparation easier for law students. Visit Lawgnan.in to access well-structured study materials, previous year LLB papers, case laws, and practice notes to help you excel in your law exams confidently.
