A with an intention to steal opens the almirah of B and finds it empty. Has A committed any offence?

Facts of the Case

A, with the intention to steal, enters B’s house or room and opens B’s almirah hoping to find valuables. However, after opening it, A discovers that the almirah is empty. No movable property is actually taken, and nothing is removed from B’s possession.
The only act committed is opening the almirah with dishonest intention.

The question is whether A has committed any offence under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) despite the absence of actual theft.

Issues in the Case

  1. Whether A’s act of opening B’s almirah with intention to steal amounts to theft under Section 378 IPC?
  2. Whether A’s act can be classified as an attempt to commit theft under Section 511 IPC?
  3. Whether the offence of attempted theft requires actual movable property to be present?
  4. Whether mere preparation amounts to an offence, or whether A’s act constitutes an attempt?

Legal Principles Applicable

a) Section 378 IPC – Theft

The essentials of theft are:

  1. Dishonest intention to take property
  2. Movable property
  3. Out of possession of someone
  4. Without consent
  5. Moving that property in order to take it

In this case, the almirah is empty, so there is no movable property. Hence, theft is not complete.

b) Doctrine of Attempt – Section 511 IPC

Section 511 punishes:

  • Attempts to commit offences punishable with imprisonment,
  • Even if the attempt fails,
  • Provided the act done is more than mere preparation.

Tests for attempt (as per Indian case law):

  • The act must be proximate to the commission of the offence.
  • There must be a direct movement towards the commission of the crime.
  • The act must be unmistakably connected with the offence.

Opening an almirah with intention to steal is an act towards committing theft, and not merely preparation.

Relevant Case Laws

1. Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab

The Supreme Court held that attempt begins where preparation ends, and when the act is proximate to the commission of the offence.

2. State of Maharashtra v. Mohammad Yakub

Attempt includes acts that are immediate steps directly intended to commit the offence.

3. R v. Eagleton (English case often cited in Indian courts)

An act must be “immediately connected” to the offence to be considered an attempt.

Applying these principles, A directly attempted to steal by opening the almirah.

c) Concept of “Impossibility” in Criminal Law

Even if the almirah is empty, the attempt to commit theft does not fail merely because the crime was factually impossible.

Example: If someone picks an empty pocket intending to steal, it still amounts to attempt to commit theft.

Indian courts have upheld this principle.

Conclusion of Legal Principles

  • No theft under Section 378 IPC
  • But clear attempt to commit theft under Section 511 IPC
  • Factual impossibility does not absolve criminal liability

Possible Judgement

Based on the facts and relevant legal principles, the court would likely hold:

Judgement

A is not guilty of theft, because no movable property existed in the almirah.

However, A is guilty of attempt to commit theft under Section 511 read with Section 379 IPC, because:

  • He had a dishonest intention to steal
  • He performed an act directly connected with the commission of the offence
  • The act went beyond mere preparation
  • The crime failed only due to impossibility

Punishment

Under Section 511 IPC, A may be punished with:

  • Imprisonment up to half of the maximum term prescribed for the actual offence of theft
    or
  • Fine
    or both.

Thus, A will be convicted for attempt to commit theft, not for theft itself.

About lawgnan

For more detailed case analyses, exam-oriented notes, and simplified explanations of complex legal concepts, visit Lawgana.in—your dedicated platform for high-quality legal learning. Whether you are preparing for law school exams, judiciary preparation, CLAT PG, or competitive law tests, Lawgana.in provides structured notes, memory hacks, charts, case briefs, and conceptual clarity. Explore in-depth articles on IPC, CrPC, Evidence Act, Contract Law, Tort Law, and more. Stay updated with the latest judgments and legal developments. Strengthen your legal understanding and boost your exam performance today by visiting Lawgana.in.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *