‘A’ draws a picture of ‘Z’ stealing and running away with ‘B’s watch. In fact no such act took place. Whether ‘Z’ has any remedy against ‘A’?

Facts of the Case

• ‘A’ created a drawing depicting ‘Z’ stealing and running away with B’s watch.
• The act portrayed in the drawing did not actually occur; it is entirely fabricated.
• The drawing was made public, potentially harming Z’s reputation.
• ‘Z’ wishes to know whether he has any legal remedy against A for this false depiction.

Issues in the Case

1. Whether drawing a false depiction of Z committing theft constitutes defamation under Indian law?
2. Whether Z can claim criminal or civil remedy against A?
3. Whether intention (mens rea) of A affects liability?
4. Whether publication or dissemination of the drawing is necessary to establish offence?

Legal Principles Covered

A. Defamation – Sections 499 and 500 IPC

• Section 499 IPC defines defamation:
  • Any act intending to harm reputation,
  • Alleging untrue facts about a person,
  • Publication to any third party.
• Section 500 IPC prescribes punishment: imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both.
• In this case:
  • The drawing falsely accuses Z of theft,
  • Harmful to Z’s reputation,
  • Intended for public view → satisfies defamation elements.

B. Civil Remedy – Tort of Defamation

• Z may also sue A civilly for damages under tort of defamation, claiming:
  • Damage to reputation,
  • Mental distress,
  • Potential economic loss.

C. Publication Requirement

• Criminal and civil defamation requires that the false statement or depiction is communicated to at least one other person besides the victim.
• Mere private drawing, without dissemination, may not constitute defamation.

D. Mens Rea / Intention

• Intention to harm reputation is a key element for defamation.
• Reckless disregard for truth can also suffice.

Possible Judgement

Court’s Likely Findings

1. Criminal Liability under IPC:
   • If the drawing is published to third parties, A is guilty of defamation under Section 499/500 IPC.
   • If not published, criminal liability may not arise.
2. Civil Remedy:
   • Z can file a civil suit for damages against A, irrespective of publication, claiming harm to reputation and mental distress.
3. Evidence Requirement:
   • Court will require proof that the drawing was intended for public view or circulated to third parties.
   • Evidence of falsity and intent to defame will be considered.

Probable Judicial Outcome

• A is criminally liable under Section 499/500 IPC if the drawing was published.
• A is civilly liable for defamation; Z is entitled to compensation/damages.
• Mere creation of the drawing without publication may not attract criminal liability, but civil action may still be possible.

About lawgnan

Want to understand how false drawings, fabricated visuals, or misleading portrayals can constitute defamation under Indian law? Visit Lawgana.in for a clear and authoritative explanation of Sections 499 and 500 IPC with practical illustrations, case-based analysis, and exam-friendly notes. Whether you’re preparing for law school exams, judiciary preparation, CLAT PG, or simply wish to strengthen your legal knowledge, Lawgana.in provides you with easy, structured, and authentic legal content. Explore more case studies, IPC explanations, legal remedies, and concept-based learning guides only on Lawgana.in—your trusted platform for quality legal education.