Hearsay evidence is one of the most important concepts in the Law of Evidence, and its exclusion forms a foundational rule in judicial proceedings. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 emphasizes that courts must rely on facts that are proven through direct, primary, and reliable testimony. Hearsay evidence—information received from another person and not based on direct knowledge—lacks reliability and therefore is generally inadmissible. This article explains the meaning of hearsay evidence, the reasons why it is excluded, and the established statutory exceptions under the Indian Evidence Act where hearsay evidence becomes legally admissible. The purpose is to help students, practitioners, and aspirants understand the principle deeply and apply it effectively in examinations and real-life legal practice.
Meaning and Nature of Hearsay Evidence
Hearsay evidence refers to a statement made outside the court, presented to prove the truth of the matter stated, without the maker of the statement being examined as a witness. In simple terms, it is “second-hand evidence.” For example, if A testifies that “B told me he saw C commit the theft,” A is presenting hearsay evidence because A does not have direct knowledge of the event. The court generally requires direct evidence, meaning the witness must depose to the facts personally perceived through sight, hearing, or any other sense. Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act mandates that “oral evidence must, in all cases whatever, be direct.” This ensures that the witness can be cross-examined, and the court can observe the credibility, demeanor, and truthfulness of the speaker.
Hearsay evidence is considered weak because it is not given on oath by the original declarant, cannot be cross-examined, and may be distorted through repetition. It often leads to unreliability because it carries the risk of misunderstanding, deliberate or accidental misrepresentation, and exaggeration. Courts therefore avoid relying on such evidence except in specific, well-defined circumstances.
Why Hearsay Evidence Is Excluded: The Rationale
The exclusion of hearsay evidence is based on several legal and logical principles. Firstly, hearsay deprives the court of the opportunity to evaluate the credibility of the original speaker. A witness repeating another person’s statement may not fully understand the intention, tone, or context in which the statement was made. Secondly, the rule protects the right of the accused to cross-examine the witnesses against them. Cross-examination is one of the strongest tools to test the truthfulness of testimony. If a witness is merely narrating someone else’s words, the court loses the ability to scrutinize the original source.
Thirdly, hearsay opens the door to fabricated or unverifiable evidence. Allowing such statements could lead to injustice, as there is no mechanism to ensure accuracy. The Indian Evidence Act promotes fairness by ensuring only legally tested evidence is relied upon. This is why Section 60 stresses.direct evidence, and Section 59 excludes oral hearsay by default. Yet, the law also recognizes that there are certain situations where hearsay is inherently trustworthy or unavoidable, and thus creates specific exceptions to the general rule.
Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay Evidence
Although hearsay is generally inadmissible, the Indian Evidence Act provides several exceptions where hearsay is accepted due to necessity, reliability, or public interest.
1. Dying Declaration (Section 32(1))
Statements made by a person as to the cause or circumstances of their death are admissible even if the person cannot be produced for examination. This exception is based on the belief that a person on the verge of death would not lie. This is a major exception permitting hearsay evidence in criminal cases involving homicide.
2. Statements of Persons Who Cannot Be Called as Witnesses (Section 32)
Statements made by persons who are dead, missing, or incapable of giving testimony fall under Section 32. These include entries in books of account, statements relating to public rights, and statements against interest.
3. Res Gestae (Section 6)
Statements made spontaneously during the course of an event and forming part of the same transaction are admissible. Such statements are considered trustworthy because they are made under the excitement of the moment, leaving no time for fabrication.
4. Admissions and Confessions (Sections 17–31)
The law treats admissions and confessions as relevant facts, even if they may have some elements of hearsay, because they are statements made against the interest of the maker and hence presumed reliable.
5. Statements in Public Records (Section 35)
Entries in public registers or official documents made by public servants in the performance of their duties are admissible as evidence.
6. Statements in Maps, Charts, and Published Works (Section 37)
These are considered trustworthy due to their public nature and authorship by impartial experts.
7. Expert Treatises and Opinions (Section 60, proviso)
In some cases, expert opinions contained in books may be referred to even if the author is unavailable for cross-examination.
8. Evidence in Previous Proceedings (Section 33)
Statements recorded in a prior judicial proceeding may be admissible if the witness cannot be called again, provided the opposing party had the right and opportunity to cross-examine previously.
Mnemonic to Remember the Exceptions to Hearsay
Use the mnemonic: “DRAPE-PS”
D – Dying Declaration
R – Res Gestae
A – Admissions & Confessions
P – Public Records
E – Expert Treatises
P – Previous Proceedings
S – Statements of unavailable persons (Sec. 32)
About lawgnan
If you want to master evidence law with clarity, accuracy, and real-life applicability, visit Lawgana.in, your trusted legal learning platform. Whether you are a law student, judicial services aspirant, or practicing advocate, Lawgana.in provides simplified explanations, case-based learning, and exam-oriented notes to strengthen your conceptual foundation. Explore deeply researched articles, legal updates, and practical guides designed to boost your confidence and performance in courts and competitive exams. Stay informed, stay empowered, and enhance your legal journey with resources crafted by experts.
Start learning smarter today—join Lawgana.in now!
